http://www.larouchepub.com/exon/exon_toc.html
I did not slander anyone.
Sure you did. You are passing on gossip and distortions and you are unwilling to get the facts. You show a perverse disregard for the truth. Get yerself educated before you pass on opinions that have been handed to you. http://www.larouchepub.com/exon/exon_toc.html
You study the material and philosophy outside the directives of the FDS.
Most people read newspapers and periodicals that they assume are telling them the truth. I am the sort that doesn't settle for the mainstream version of reality. So I have made it a point to seek out alternative sources of information on current events. The EIR is by far the most reliable source of news that I have found.
How do you know whether La Rouche is an apostate waiting to make your mind into mush? Has the Society given you approval to read La Rouche material, especially since it is highly political in nature, and thus a part of Satan's Great Organization?
You are getting ridiculous, as if you weren't already silly beyond grasp. LaRouche is a humanist. He believes that the destiney of humanity lies withing the realm of humans to control. I frequently witness to LaRouche activists and they adamantly disagree with me that God is going to personally intervene in human affairs. But, I value their assessment of the world's present condition, especially as regards the Anglo oligarchy. As far as getting permission from the Watchtower, I didn't know that was neccesary. What you are obviously oblivious to, among other things, is that ALL news sources are political in nature. The very fact, as I previously pointed out, that the media has given La Rouche the silent treatment indicates that they have a political bias towards his political movement. If they really thought that he was a crackpot they would without fear stick a microphone in front of him, as they do any number of morons with opinions. But it should be obvious that their conspiracy of silence is because they fear him. Just as all evil men fear the truth.
Who, what? Prove to me that any President
The EIR has high level diplomatic connections which is evident to those who regularly read the journal. As for American presidents Ronald Reagan personally met with LaRouche and the so-called Stars Wars program that Reagan was touting was Larouche's brainchild. That's another reason why the London oligarchy went berserk and ordered LaRouche to be taken down.
How? What media sources? Which journals? What network stations? Whcih journalists, reporters, or newscasters? Tell me You Know who 'they' are!
They all have lied. It is a fact that, for example, LaRouche got substantial percentages of primary votes in the last two presidential elections, enough to qualify for matching funds. Yet the media never even reported that Clinton or Gore had such a formidable challenger within the Democratic party. That is deliberately misleading the public and evidence that the media are controlled by the Anglo oligarchy and cannot be trusted.
Prove this! The media does not take serious any contender unless they get at least 2 to 4 % of the polls.
LaRouche got 25% of the democratic primary vote in Clinton's home state of Arkansas for example. If you want to know the facts do the research yourself on the links I provided and stop this moronic blustering.
Oh yes, the establishment greatly fears him. Ha! He is not on the map! There is no need to fear him.
I note that you have a moral defect that causes you to be adverse to the truth of all sorts. That apparently is your preference.
Actually, he never said it that way. He said, [i]"You can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time."
Wrong again fool. At least though you are consistent, I'll give you that much. You should really stop embarassing yourself with this nonsense though. Lincoln said: "You can fool some of the people all of the time. And all of the people some of the time. But you can't fool all of the people all of the time." / You Know